I am pleased to host a guest blog from Dr. Andrew Neff, an Epilepsy Foundation board member who was kind enough to share this report on a recent Epilepsy Therapy Project Pipeline conference he attended in San Francisco.
The Epilepsy Therapy Project (ETP) hosted its annual Pipeline Conference in San Francisco to present and assess treatments currently in development for epilepsy and choose the $50,000 Shark Tank grant winner. The 3 day event was well attended by influencers in the epilepsy space and provided an enticing look at the most promising seizure treatments in development. ETP co-founder Warren Lammert stressed the need for more effective medications with fewer side effects and more FDA-approved medical devices. Overarching themes included:
Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AED’s) Progress But No Major Breakthroughs In Sight
New medications include one approved (Clobazam), one close to approval (Retigabine), and 5 in late stage clinical trials such as Brivaracetam and Ganaxolone. Challenges include increased cost for both development and testing, which combined with unpredictable efficacy rates in late stage trials, have narrowed the pipeline of medications in the later stages of development. Larger pharmaceutical companies are now licensing more often from smaller companies and investing less in their own development. Looking for upside, companies are favoring medications that show promise for multiple conditions vs. epilepsy alone.
Early stage concepts were enticing and encouraged debate. From neurotropins and genetics to biomarkers and receptor trafficking, new approaches are plentiful but still early stage. New medications in testing include GABA inhibitors and Tonabersat. One theme was new techniques for administering proven treatments, including:
Shark Tank Competition – Six New Ideas, Many Sharks, And One $50,000 Grant Winner
A commendable and let's say it, exciting new event was the Shark Tank competition. The goal was to develop a novel concept to help people with epilepsy, with the winner receiving a $50,000 development grant. Response was strong, and over 40 early submissions were narrowed down to 6 finalists who presented. Five panelists, ranging from investors to patients, reviewed the ideas and voted, and a vote from attendees was needed to break the tie. The six finalists included....
The judges were top notch, complimenting efforts yet asking probing questions to assess the market need, feasibility, and tangible patient benefits. Differing backgrounds for judges led to entertaining debate, and their final votes were split enough that an audience vote was needed to break the tie. The $50,000 grant winner was the patient's father with Video Monitor #1, which was appealing with its limited development costs and functional model.
Implantable Devices for Seizures Await Approval
While only Cyberonics' Vagus Nerve Stimulator (VNS) has FDA approval, other companies are developing new implantable devices. While they work slightly differently, they are all intended for refractory patients, most with tonic clonics, who have had no success with medications. Several devices are still awaiting FDA approval in the US, with one already approved in Europe.
Other devices included new electrode systems for improved or more portable EEG recording, but without FDA approvals in the US, not much has changed for patients in the US device market in the last year.
The takeaway from this key conference was that more progress is needed in the battle with epilepsy. Attendees witnessed 23 medications and devices in development and the entertaining Shark Tank competition with a $50,00 grant to the winner. Collaboration is strong and must continue between all sectors, including non-profits like the host Epilepsy Therapy Project as well as the Epilepsy Foundation and CURE if we're going to find a much-needed breakthrough for patients struggling with seizures. Remember, knowledge is power.
Comment
Comment by bryan farley on March 5, 2012 at 10:36pm Southie,
I would like to know more about home monitoring... or other monitor that are similar to our normal environment.
BF
Comment by Southie on March 5, 2012 at 7:37pm I have done the video home monitoring; with my own personal computer - it was a personal agreement between my Neuro and myself; but that was some years ago, and seizures were captured (Nocturnal) in which gave him the idea exactly what type of EEG test to run up. Seeing myself in seizures was of no big deal, while some were what I would say "too mild or not of significance importance" - it's weird to post this that I knew what the Doctor wanted and needed and that he got... and exactly what he wanted!
I am a strong supporter of Home Video Monitoring, since Hospital VEEG's just "seems to be a cure-all" (as you can tell by posters who have gone through it) for many; while those at home suffers after having undergone days to weeks and weeks of waiting for a seizure. I believe the home environment is best suited.
One question however, would an AEEG be involved (mine was not) or included or would the whole situation be differing?
As for the FDA BAN - I just received a FDA Letter pertaining to Neurontin / Gabapentin and posted it on Living Well - they want to eliminate this AED drug... I called FDA and ... go read up on it ... self-sufficient right there and I am peeved because I cannot find anywhere or maybe I am looking in all the wrong places where the FDA wants to consider a ban on Neurontin / Gabapentin.
If we let the Congress/FDA/President have their way ... before you know it - we, the people with Epilepsy are not going to have any anti-epileptic medications available at all; so what options are going to be available for us - smuggling? (HONEST! Think about it ...)
Comment by bryan farley on February 23, 2012 at 4:48pm @lisa,
I think I met him. I did not realize he was from EFA. On my personal blog, I might have a photo of him. Does he live out here or in the DC area?
bf
Comment by Lisa Boylan on February 23, 2012 at 1:30pm I like the NFL helmet collaboration idea!
Big fan of #1 Video home monitoring . I have noctornal seizures & done the 5 day stay in EMU twice now. I too considered having this kind of home device!! It has great potential & I'd like to see Easton Ridell (NFL helmets) based here in Ohio & the Cleveland Clinic colloborate on this project.
Comment by Lisa Boylan on February 23, 2012 at 12:19pm Hi Bryan--that is great to hear! Thanks for letting me know. Did you hapen to also see our new research director Joe Twist? He was there as well.
Comment by bryan farley on February 23, 2012 at 1:32am I was able to attend part of the conference. I live across the bay from San Francisco and the third day was open to the public. (Perhaps I could have attended the first two days too; I am not sure if I am the public.)
Andrew represented the Epilepsy Foundation of America well. He spoke on a panel with a few other people affected with epilepsy. Most of the people had epilepsy. Including our voices is important for many reasons, even for improving the effectiveness of research.
Thank you Andrew and Lisa.
© 2012 Created by EF Admin.
You need to be a member of Epilepsy Foundation to add comments!
Join Epilepsy Foundation